spin on a very comman question
Posted Tue Dec 10, 2013 07:35 PM
Posted Wed Dec 11, 2013 01:43 AM
Posted Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:47 PM
Posted Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:04 AM
this is sooooooooooo true!!!
I'm sorry, but for me skill is way more important than size.. and if a guy is well hung and can't use it.. there's a good chance it's not only going to not feel good, but possibly hurt!
Posted Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:11 AM
Posted Thu Dec 12, 2013 06:22 PM
How about if I turn the question around and ask if you need more skill to make use of a big cock as a smaller one provides pleasure more easily?
The size of a man's cock, has no correlation to either skill or pleasure.
Posted Thu Dec 12, 2013 11:58 PM
Posted Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:19 AM
Posted Fri Dec 13, 2013 04:33 AM
Perhaps formulation of the question or choice of words wasn't the best. If not, MissS is right; this is flawed or loaded question.
Size does play a role but all is well as long as it is not on either end of extremes. From top of my head almost 90% of men are in range of sizes that make them 'compatible' with virtually all women. The very same guy can be 'too big' or 'not big enough' for a few but 'just right' for the most. It all boils down to compatibility between two individuals but most times physical measurements are no the problem. Not even the most perfect fittings will help if there's no genuine desire to pleasure and enjoy each other. At any given size there are guys who are great lovers, those who are anything but, and those who are somewhere in between.
Bottom line, relating size to lovemaking skills is like talking apples and oranges.
This post has been edited by SirFoggy: Fri Dec 13, 2013 04:35 AM
Posted Fri Dec 13, 2013 04:41 AM