Do girls like cut or uncut?
Posted Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:02 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 08:07 AM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:28 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:43 PM
I would regret it, I can't imagine being "open" all the time - it is so sensitive... I think that circumcision by default - by some religious rules or something is foolish if not outright idiotic. If "God" intended man to NOT have foreskin, why did It create it in the first place? So, why do Jews and Muslims cut that off? I am clueless.
There is no health benefit and it goes against human rights - a child cannot consent. The only justified circumcision would be for some medical reasons, but that is rare.
Foreskin is a natural thing - a protection for penis glans, why remove it if it is naturally given? Oh, human stupidity!
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 02:36 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 02:49 PM
Does foreskin even "exist" when a man is fully aroused and erect? My experience is that mine becomes practically non-existent when I'm completely hard and ready for penetration - the erection stretches it so I can hardly pull it over the (also swollen by arousal) glans. When the erection is extreme as right before penetration there is hardly a way for the foreskin to move anymore - there is no foreskin actually - it is so stretched - the cock looks and feels like it would be "cut" - see
Now maybe that's only my experience, I don't know about other men, but I wouldn't know about any "slinky" effect.
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 02:58 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 03:06 PM
Yeah, never mind, I am maybe a bit different with this erection thing - I doubt that any woman ever saw my limp dick before sex - I always get very erect very fast, even before getting naked and I tend to stay that way until "relief", so it was a weird information to me that foreskin would move much during penetration - I realize that maybe all man don't get so feverishly erect - like you describe that foreskin tightens while giving a blowjob - mine would be already too tight even before her mouth would approach me and feeling the first breath on my glans would already stretch it beyond moving, hahahaha!
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 03:18 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 03:35 PM
I love uncut but either is good with me. The man behind it is the real turn on!
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 03:46 PM
None of these are the ones i was thinking of, i was one of the first to respond on the other one, its not a big deal, but it was like posted the day or two days before.
Didn't mean to upset, i repeat my answers all the time! I just thought maybe he had posted the other one also... i found out afterwards he didn't when i checked the profile. Just making an observation. Also in the rules and regulations essentially it asks people not to do this and to use the search function.
I thought i added in my opinion, but i guess that was the other one, see i cant keep track of where i have said what!!!!
I don't care, i have never got to experience a man with a foreskin, Most of the United States men are circumcised i guess. I wish i could experience it, i think they look sexy especially when the head is just barely peeking out of the foreskin, so sexy!
As for circumcision, its just a cultural thing, you can't say its idiotic or dumb, different cultures and rituals make the world interesting. My son is circumcised, I didn't care if he was or wasn't, and since i am not a male growing up in the US, i let his father decide, i don't know what social differences it would make for my child growing up. I don't know if Texas boys get harassment if they aren't circumcised or not, i knew in high school it was a weird occurrence to know about someone who wasn't circumcised. Its just a social norm here. Also, i think circumcised men still thoroughly enjoy sex without their foreskin, so to each their own.
Many men swear by prostate stimulation, but many others wont try it, apparently it heightens a male orgasm. iI don't know though, everyone is different and there is nothing wrong with circumcision, or men wanting to keep it or wanting to lose it!
This post has been edited by LadyR: Mon Feb 28, 2011 03:48 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 04:49 PM
My "problem" is that I am overly sensitive to injustice done to persons who cannot fight back - like in this case cutting the foreskin of babies who cannot have a say in it - and the fact that we are born that way - what if someone decided long ago that it would be fancy to cut our earlobes, since they don't have any particular biological function (much less than the protective function of the foreskin) and everyone would be cutting babies' ears out of some barbaric custom. What is given by nature should not be spoiled by some sad excuse for "culture".
I was actually unaware that circumcision was the US thing, until recently. I thought that it is only part of some weird religious "rites" of Muslims and Jews.
Do you know what was the initial origin of widespread non-religious circumcision in the US and 19th century England, as I learned recently? Hostility towards masturbation!! and some other misguided sex-related ideas. So for anyone frequenting something like "Sex forums" this might be red alert for something that is obviously WRONG!
So, it is not really a "cultural" thing (yes, it became sort of a sorry tradition) - it is more a barbaric, backwards remnant of a sick and perverted puritanical mindset. OK, I am exaggerating a little - but since it is done to babies - I do feel quite some aversion towards it.
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 05:14 PM
What did I know, that was they way it was around me, all 4 of my brothers were circumcisioned when they were born. I would have trusted the doctor back then, now, as I am older and much wiser, I would question any doctor that would try to explain that to me. I would research it deeply to get the best options to choose from.
And true in Texas, if you heard of someone not being cut it was a very rare occurence and they would possibly be teased at my schools growing up.
I love all cocks. I want to experience an uncut one and feel how great others say it feels. I can just imagine and there are some that do seem to get so erect I do not even realize they are not cut until they show more flaccid pics.
Now that I am older I would never judge anyone whether they were or weren't cut. It's very interesting to see the differences and just as my own preference because this is what I grew up with, I love the look of the cut penis, fully erect or flaccid. It looks good and tasty to me. The flaccid uncut one is not as appealing to me but my tastes and likes are changing daily!
I too don't think being cut has too big of impact on those not experiencing all the sensations. They all seem to be doing just fine with me!
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 05:50 PM
As for circumcising babies, as babies it is less painful, so if a boy, especially raised in texas comes to be 14 and getting made fun of all the time, and his only defense on his penis is "well sex is going to feel better for me...." he might want to get it snipped off. However, at that age, many more nerve endings have emerged and it would be more painful for him to do then. So being a mother and considering the social consequences, it makes sense to go ahead and have him snipped. Though, like i mentioned before, i left that decision up to his dad because he knows more about being a boy than i do, who knew? Plus, cleaning up poopy diapers is already dirty enough without having to add the foreskin in there. Its not even really a tradition, as being an american goes its cultural here to be circumcised, without any real attached beliefs attached. Just the societal preference here.
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 08:26 PM
Forgot to mention that my son and his friends in the old neighbourhood in Montreal used to tease a Muslim boy because he had a "pink" penis. A little explaining at home fixed that. Kids can be very cruel to one another, but it's up to the parents to manage that.
This post has been edited by Olive: Mon Feb 28, 2011 08:29 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 08:48 PM
Posted Mon Feb 28, 2011 09:05 PM
I'm so averse to it that I can't even go looking for it again in case it opens and I see it.
a quick youtube search will find it for you though. Its inhumane frankly and no child of mine would ever have it done unless there was a medical reason.
its not more hygienic at all, men in the UK don't go through this and they aren't all running around with germ ridden cocks. I don't know why doctors think to say that to anyone as a justification, thats like cutting the labia off for hygiene reasons.