Posted Tue Apr 03, 2007 08:25 PM
10-Perfect/Excellent, all qualities of that person are to your liking, extremely hard to find and even harder to get.
9-Great, just about everything you want in a guy/girl, not quite the "WOW" factor of a 10 but awfully close.
8-Very Good, a lot of ppl fall into this category, not a slight against them, but they're a dime a dozen and therefore aren't oustanding enough to reach 9 or 10 status.
7-Good, some ppl regard this as a cutoff of sorts.
6-Decent/Worthwhile, there may be certain qualities that sway certain ppl from that person.
5-Average/Fair, no terrible qualities, but nothing that would really bump this person up higher than in the middle.
4-Below Average, a few redeeming qualities but majority probably won't go for him/her.
3-Poor, possibly one or two redeeming qualities, but not enough to outweigh the bad.
2-Very Poor, you probably wouldn't even want to touch them with a 10-foot pole.
1-Bad, you can barely look at them, like 10's they're extremely rare.
Feel free to discuss anything related to this topic. Maybe we can come to a consensus on some of these sub-topics.
Posted Tue Apr 03, 2007 09:29 PM
BUT, all my friends are guys and I get to hear all the inside stuff I would rather NOT hear about. Yes, they rate girls by numbers and pick apart their body features. I HATE IT. I think it's the stupidest thing ever. These are girls they aren't even talking to, just random girls that happen to be at the same restaurant/store/bar/whatever as we are. They didn't ask to be picked apart or rated on a scale. Their argument is, what these girls don't know won't hurt them. But I think on a whole the 'rating system' is pretty bad.
Posted Tue Apr 03, 2007 09:31 PM
Posted Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:44 PM
A 'fail' score meant, "not my thing"
A 'nice butt' score meant "nice, not bad, yum"
A 'fantastic butt' score meant 'wow!, yummmmmm!"
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 03:25 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 03:33 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 03:47 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 04:15 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 04:58 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 06:53 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 09:11 PM
Posted Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:42 PM