Interested about a foreskin experiment? Click on this thread!
Posted Mon Apr 09, 2007 02:18 PM
If anyone is interested, I would be willing to type it out on this forum for others to know. This is a highly debated issue, and I thought I would be able to contribute with an actual experiment.
If there is enough interest, I will post the experiment. I will be doing this experiment for myself anyways, so it wouldn't be too much of a hassle. Thanks for your time.
P.S. For the sake of the experiment for myself, the poll will end on the 1 June 2007.
Posted Mon Apr 09, 2007 04:53 PM
Posted Mon Apr 09, 2007 05:21 PM
Generally the debate is about how circumcised guys have the same sensitivity or have less sensitivity than guys who are not circumcised. The debate is also about how the foreskin adds feeling compared to guys who are not circumcised because the foreskin has nerve endings. If there were enough people interested, I was going to do the experiment with a full layout and details, because barring emotional and mental details of sex, and with simple science, it's a fact that if you have the foreskin you have more nerves in your penis. Now whether or not that will contribute to realistic experiences is the matter that I am testing.
Feel free to PM me if any of you have questions, concerns, etc. Or just post in the thread, I will do my best to respond, as I am in college right now, and I am very busy. Thank you for your time.
Posted Mon Apr 09, 2007 05:29 PM
Posted Mon Apr 09, 2007 06:22 PM
Posted Mon Apr 09, 2007 06:36 PM
I'm just doing an experiment to see the difference, that's all. The functionality of the penis itself is not in question. I'm neither concerned nor worried about the effects it has on a relationship, which should be negligible anyways, any loving relationship would not have circumcision as a pivotal factor. This is simply an experiment concerning sensitivity.
Posted Tue Apr 10, 2007 08:05 AM
Posted Tue Apr 10, 2007 03:25 PM
Posted Tue Apr 10, 2007 06:01 PM
That's the thing though. Because you have never had a foreskin, you do not know how it feels. I am also aware that that the argument goes both ways, I have never been circumcised, but that is what the permanent retraction section of the experiment is for. If you think about it, a permanently retracted foreskin would match a circumcised penis with the exception that the foreskin is not present. The foreskin holds thousands of nerves, so theoretically, that would add more feeling to it. I will type up the layout of the experiment when I can.
I am not here to argue which type of penis is better, I am simply going to conduct an experiment and see what the effects of said experiment is. Because, common sense would say, and hopefully you would agree as well, it really doesn't matter what science says about something if your experience proves otherwise?
I was going to conduct this experiment anyways, and I was gauging to see whether or not people were interested in what I was doing. Whether or not I post it depends on if you as the audience would like to know what I am doing. In the end, people will have impasses, and even if they are right or wrong, they will still believe what they want to believe, it's that simple.
Posted Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:02 PM